Performance Improvement Plans were created with good intentions.
But in practice, they have become something else.
They are often introduced too late, framed defensively, and experienced as punishment rather than support. Over time, this has taught employees to fear the process and leaders to hide behind it.
That is not leadership.
That is avoidance with a signature line.
We believe performance conversations should lead to clarity, growth, and accountability—not confusion, fear, or resignation.
That is why we do not use PIPs.
We use Performance Alignment Plans™.
A Performance Alignment Plan™ (PAP™) exists to:
It is not a disciplinary shortcut.
It is not a legal shield.
It is not a quiet exit strategy.
It is a leadership tool.
We believe:
We believe leadership happens before formal discipline, not instead of it.
Leaders using Performance Alignment Plans™ commit to:
If improvement occurs, leadership has succeeded.
If improvement does not occur, the documentation reflects fairness, transparency, and good faith leadership—not surprise.
Performance Alignment Plans™ are not:
They are a way to earn those outcomes.
If a document feels like a weapon, it is not alignment.
And it is not leadership.
Leadership is not proven by paperwork.
It is proven by clarity, courage, and consistency.
That is the standard we choose.
Performance Alignment Plan™ is a trademarked leadership framework of The PSAP Consulting Group.
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.